Comments from Harvard (Kenyon) Here is a summary of the survey of Magellan instruments. We had 16 responses. All respondents did not vote for every instrument. Most instruments end up with an average of 'M'. To make a finer rank, I computed averages as shown in the last column of the first table. In the second table, I list the number of 'H' ranks for each instrument. best wishes Scott Instrument Rank N Avg Score MagIC M 16 2.2 PANIC M 14 2.4 IMACS spectrograph F/2 H 15 2.7 IMACS spectrograph F/4 M 14 2.0 MIKE M 14 2.3 MIKE FIBERS M 14 1.6 B&C M 14 1.6 LDSS upgraded multiobject optical spectrograph M 14 1.5 Infrared echellette M 14 1.7 FourStar wide field IR imager H 14 2.5 MagE optical echellette M 13 1.7 IMACS gismo (image slicing multislit front-end) L 13 1.4 MMIRS multiobject IR spectrograph M 14 2.4 Megacam Optical wide field imager M 13 2.2 IMACS MMTF tunable filter imager M 13 1.9 IMACS multiobject echellette M 13 1.7 F/11 adaptive optics secondary M 14 2.4 MIRAC4 with F/11 AO secondary M 13 2.1 MIRAC4 without F/11 AO secondary L 13 1.4 average grade uses H = 3, M = 2 , L = 1 Ranking by number of 'H' only: Instrument N MagIC 7 PANIC 7 IMACS spectrograph F/2 12 IMACS spectrograph F/4 5 MIKE 7 MIKE FIBERS 3 B&C 3 LDSS upgraded multiobject optical spectrograph 2 Infrared echellette 2 FourStar wide field IR imager 8 MagE optical echellette 3 IMACS gismo (image slicing multislit front-end) 6 MMIRS multiobject IR spectrograph 8 Megacam Optical wide field imager 7 IMACS MMTF tunable filter imager 3 IMACS multiobject echellette 2 F/11 adaptive optics secondary 8 MIRAC4 with F/11 AO secondary 3 MIRAC4 without F/11 AO secondary 0